Skip to content

Pensions – James Brokenshire on this day in history.

Made me laugh today, James Brokenshire has suggested that we be allowed to draw money from invested pension funds in order to help purchase a main home. Immediately the pension industry ‘kicked off’ with screams of no, not acceptable with plain dismay that any member of Parliament would dare suggest it.

Fact is from a financial standpoint it makes perfect sense. Your main residence enjoys tax free growth and a good deal of tax breaks on sale – it’s also a sound investment in relation to Inheritance Tax.  But for first time buyers there is a need to get hold of around £30k in order to purchase a first home – and if people are paying rent – this is of course paid from after tax income which is effectively double taxed by Government  – as landlords declare the income received – another reason why the system favoured Buy to Let – until of course it got out of control.

Here are some of the reasons why the idea of James Brokenshire is a good one, but they are not new. My book “The Great British Pension Swindle” covers things in a lot more detail (Amazon)

Renting your own home.

If you earn £26,500 per year your take home pay (April 2019) will be £21.555 basically means that  in order to get £800 per month rent after tax you need to earn around £1000 before tax in order to pay that.

Of course the same applies to a mortgage – but if you are paying a mortgage at some point the costs will cease. It therefore makes sense to buy instead of renting. Please note that renting also brings a good deal of flexibility so buying now may not be the best idea.

If we consider average mortgage interest rates, you’ll note that they have not always been low and the long term average is considerably more than the rate your lender offers you now. In fact somewhere around 4% is the norm, but of course have been a lot higher in the past.  As interest rates increase (which they will) you’ll need to use up more of your tax paid income to support it – but the same applies to rent.

Graph supplied by

Pension Fund Performance

If you compare investment returns over the long term you’ll note something that doesn’t quite add up. Of the 14496  funds listed on – Pensions ( ) most don’t have any long term fund performance or the performance is well under par.

Of these fourteen thousand odd funds few show performance over the longer term, they change names, consolidate with other funds or just disappear. The cynic in me thinks there may be a reason for this.

Back to the problem.

The Aviva fund, this is the fund that’s returned about 1% per year before charges, an above average fund – they is one of many thousands that are just not delivering for you the pension consumer.

It has returned 10% over ten years – 1% per year before product charges – which will be at least 1% if you compare historical charges, there are many pension products charging more than that making it a lot worse for you. Do you know how much your provider is charging you – average fund charges and an average pension fund mean the charges are likely to be more than your council tax.

Even with a well above average fund performance you would have actually lost money – but of course still paid charges.

The winner here is the pension provider. Investing in pensions means you will probable lose money investing in pensions over a ten year period – unless you chose a low cost provider who can offer good future returns – let me know when you find it – got a ton of people who’d love to have one of them. The other winner is the Inland Revenue – the tax relief they give is returned when you draw on the funds.

Importantly, if you borrowed less on your mortgage I can guarantee you’d be better off by at least the interest charged by your lender  – pensions ain’t looking so great now are they.

The entire industry is doing it’s utmost to convince you the figures are wrong, yet as James Brokenshire has admitted – you may of course be a lot better off not having any funds in the pension – and it’s the industry that’s not telling the truth.

Invest in pensions, but sleep with one eye open – they are not what they seem.


Watt Financial Solutions – old but damning evidence of a lot ten years.

Here is the FAQ for this post.

1. Why is James Brokenshire suggesting we be allowed to draw money from invested pension funds to purchase a main home?

James Brokenshire’s proposal aims to address the challenge faced by first-time homebuyers who often struggle to gather the necessary funds for a deposit. By tapping into their pension funds, individuals could access a significant amount of money to put towards their home purchase.

2. What are the financial benefits of using pension funds to buy a home?

Using pension funds for a home purchase offers several financial advantages. Firstly, the main residence enjoys tax-free growth and tax breaks upon sale. Additionally, it serves as a solid investment in terms of inheritance tax. This approach could alleviate the burden of double taxation for renters, who currently pay rent from after-tax income.

3. How does renting compare to buying a home in terms of financial implications?

Renting a home can be financially burdensome, as a significant portion of one’s income goes towards rent payments. Buying a home, on the other hand, allows individuals to build equity over time, potentially reducing housing costs in the long run. However, renting offers flexibility that may be advantageous in certain situations.

4. What are the long-term implications of mortgage interest rates on homebuyers?

While current mortgage interest rates may seem low, historical data indicates that rates have fluctuated over time, with long-term averages significantly higher than present rates. As interest rates increase, homeowners may need to allocate more of their income towards mortgage payments, similar to renters facing rising rental costs.

5. What is the performance of pension funds, and how does it affect investors?

Many pension funds fail to deliver satisfactory returns over the long term, with a considerable number showing subpar performance or disappearing altogether. Even funds with above-average performance may not yield significant returns for investors after accounting for charges and fees. This underperformance raises questions about the effectiveness of investing in pensions.

6. What are the potential drawbacks of investing in pensions compared to other financial options?

Investing in pensions may not always yield favorable returns for investors, especially when considering the impact of fees and charges. Individuals may ultimately lose money over time, particularly if they could have achieved better returns through alternative investment strategies, such as reducing mortgage debt.

7. Where can I find additional information on this topic?

For more detailed insights into the challenges and implications of pension investments, you can explore resources such as “The Great British Pension Swindle” by the author, which provides in-depth analysis and discussion on the subject. Additionally, the provided links offer further information and statistics related to mortgage interest rates and financial calculations.